Posts: 8
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2012
If you had $500.00 or a little more, what bike would you suggest for being most dependable and last a long time.
Trek or a DiamondBack ?
And any opinions are more than welcome and needed.
Thanks,
Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
My old Trek SU100 (for $400.00) has about six years and approximately 30,000 miles on it. Probably went 15,000 before I had to replace the derailleur. Trek is a nuisance getting replacement parts and only will deal through certain authorized dealerships, but that might be an industry wide problem. I can't speak for DiamondBack, best of luck.
Posts: 2,738
Threads: 117
Joined: Sep 2009
Diamondback are not too bad, I have one, but make sure you get the best higher end you can find as they had some questionable low end ones.
Good maintenance to your Bike, can make it like the wheels are, true and smooth!
Posts: 2,709
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Diamond back now (unfortunately) is part of the same conglomerate as Raleigh, Avenir, etc. At LOT worse than Trek to deal with. They totally ignore you.
The pre-buy out Diamondback bikes are great; and I would not hesitate getting one for a project. I already have a Trek
- and it is a great bike too.
Nigel
Posts: 638
Threads: 29
Joined: May 2011
My experience with Specialized has been great. Just try calling Trek with a problem. Go ahead, try it.
Posts: 2,738
Threads: 117
Joined: Sep 2009
+1 to what Nigel said. That I didn't think about.
Good maintenance to your Bike, can make it like the wheels are, true and smooth!
